Rep. Jody Hice: DC statehood vote – this is what Democrats’ energy play is absolutely about


We’re witnessing a radical transformational push by the Left to bend and warp America’s establishments and authorities to their will. This week, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., plans to ram the subsequent part of Democrats’ technique by the Home: granting statehood to the District of Columbia.

It is a political energy play, plain and easy.

H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C., Admission Act, would admit the District of Columbia to america because the 51st state, to be known as “Washington, Douglass Commonwealth.” There are a number of basic issues with each the strategy and coverage of this invoice launched by D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton.


Wanting to solidify their slim management in Congress to power by their radical agenda, Democrats are joyful to ignore the knowledge and intent of our Founding Fathers. Let’s keep in mind, there’s a cause the District of Columbia exists as a particular federal enclave and holds a singular standing in our system of presidency as created by the Structure.

As James Madison argued in Federalist Paper No. 43, if America’s capital had been located in any state, that state would wield large affect over the federal authorities. The Structure was explicitly crafted to keep away from this by carving out a federal district wherein to seat the capital on impartial floor.

Extra from Opinion

H.R. 51 ignores the good and nonetheless legitimate reasoning that created the district over two centuries in the past.

Moreover, H.R. 51 is blatantly unconstitutional. By itself, Congress can’t grant statehood to the District of Columbia. Regardless of what you could hear from Democrats this week, it’s not that straightforward.

Whereas states have traditionally been admitted to the union by acts of Congress, the Structure explicitly discusses the district a number of occasions and grants the town particular privileges – all of which have to be addressed by a constitutional modification. It is a longstanding and bipartisan view.

In 1963, U.S. Legal professional Common Robert Kennedy, a Democrat, mentioned D.C. statehood could be “inconceivable” with out amending the Structure, and each Justice Division has since agreed. But, H.R. 51 makes no critical try and resolve this basic roadblock.

Provided that the strategy is so clearly unworkable, why are Democrats so doggedly pursuing statehood by H.R. 51?

If Democrats actually care solely about offering full illustration, there are much less problematic options that would win bipartisan assist.

Legitimately granting statehood to D.C. requires a constitutional modification – which is each immensely troublesome and extremely unlikely. Recall that there are two methods to suggest a change to the Structure: two-thirds of each chambers of Congress can vote on it, or two-thirds of state legislatures can vote to ask Congress to name a nationwide conference.

As soon as proposed, ratifying an modification requires approval from three-fourths of the states, both by the states’ legislatures or within the nationwide conference. With such a excessive bar, any modification to the Structure requires broad assist throughout the nation.

Right here we arrive on the basic downside that H.R. 51 tries to slide round. Most Individuals don’t assist granting statehood to the District of Columbia. The precise share varies from ballot to ballot, however a majority of Individuals constantly oppose statehood.

Why are Democrats pursuing this in any respect?

Democrats declare their intention is just to present the district’s residents voting illustration. But it surely’s completely false that the district has no illustration. Whereas it’s true that the district doesn’t have a voice within the Senate, it does have a delegate within the Home and three electoral votes in presidential elections – one thing no different metropolis within the nation enjoys.

Nevertheless, if Democrats actually care solely about offering full illustration, there are much less problematic options that would win bipartisan assist.

One such compromise is to cede the residential parts of the district again to Maryland, simply as Arlington and Alexandria had been ceded again to Virginia in 1846. Democrats have flatly rejected that concept.

I supplied an analogous compromise when the Home Committee on Oversight and Reform thought of H.R. 51 on April 14. I proposed an modification to permit dresidents to vote in federal elections in Maryland – an association that dates again to the interval shortly after the Structure was ratified.

In flip, Maryland would briefly obtain a further Home seat till the subsequent congressional reapportionment following the 2030 census, an affordable compromise. The District would stay impartial floor for America’s authorities, and the district’s residents would have voices with full voting energy in each chambers of Congress. Democrats refused to assist my modification.

Why would Democrats so stubbornly reject any compromise that provides voting illustration to district residents?

As a result of, in truth, it’s not about voting illustration. It’s concerning the stability of energy in Congress itself.

Like all states, the proposed “Washington, Douglass Commonwealth” would have two seats within the U.S. Senate – and Democrats know which social gathering will win these seats.

In 2020, Joe Biden acquired 92.1% of the vote in D.C., and that’s no anomaly. No Republican presidential candidate has acquired greater than 10% of the district’s vote since 1988. The state of “Washington, Douglass Commonwealth” could be probably the most liberal state in America, making California appear to be Texas by comparability!

Proper now, Democrats’ grip on energy within the Senate is so tenuous that they depend on Vice President Kamala Harris to forged tie-breaking votes. Two further Senate Democrats could be an amazing benefit in preserving their majority, and that’s what this comes all the way down to on the finish of the day.


Because the Home debates H.R. 51 this week, don’t be fooled by claims from Democrats. There’s just one actual motive right here. They want extra votes within the Senate to move their radical agenda to appease their base – the socialists and Marxists, the Black Lives Matter and #DefundThePolice actions, local weather change extremists, union bosses, social justice warriors, and so forth.

Simply as they now intention to increase the Supreme Courtroom to tilt it of their favor, Democrats additionally need to increase the Senate to cement their majority.


Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here